Better Business Bureau Refers 'Animal Care Certified' Case to the Federal Trade Commission

On August 25, 2004, the Better Business Bureau officially referred the "Animal
Care Certified" egg labeling case to the Federal Trade Commission for possible
law enforcement action against the United Egg Producers.
This major victory is the culmination of more than a year's effort by COK to
prohibit the egg industry from misleading consumers about its routine animal
abuse.
Currently, egg producers can label their egg cartons with an "Animal Care
Certified" logo even if they confine birds in cages so small they can't
flap their wings, burn off parts of their beaks without painkiller, and starve
them to the point where they've lost 30 percent of their body weight.
We hope the BBB's referral will encourage the FTC to act now to stop this consumer
fraud.
The "Animal Care Certified" Campaign Timeline:
May 2003: COK investigators documented disturbing, yet standard, cruelty
at an "Animal Care Certified" egg factory farm in Cecilton, Md. Click
here for the investigation's photos.
June 2003: COK filed a petition before the Better Business Bureau asserting
that the United Egg Producers (UEP) was engaging in false advertising by allowing
its member producers to use an "Animal Care Certified" logo on their cartons.
COK launched EggScam.com.
November 2003: After weeks of filings submitted by both the UEP and
COK, the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division ruled in COK's
favor, stating that the ACC logo is misleading and should be discontinued. The
Associated Press ran a story on its national wire about the ruling.
November 2003: The UEP appealed the case to the Better Business Bureau's
National Advertising Review Board
May 2004: The consumer protection organization affirmed its earlier
ruling and stated the ACC logo should be discontinued or modified. Again, the
Associated Press ran a story on its national wire about the ruling. Click
here to see the article.
May 2004: COK investigators gathered evidence at another "Animal
Care Certified" egg factory farm, this time in Millington, Md. Standard
egg industry abuses were once again documented in video and photos. Click
here for the investigation's photos.
July 15, 2004: Washington, D.C.'s ABC affiliate, WJLA, ran an exclusive
I-Team report on the "Animal Care Certified" issue entitled, "Egg Fraud." Click
here to watch the piece. The following day, WJLA's affiliate, News Channel
8, did a 20-minute live interview with COK's Paul Shapiro about the issue. Click
here for the transcript.
July 28 and August 4, 2004: New Jersey's Twin-Boro News ran a two-part
series on the "Animal Care Certified" controversy. Click
here to read the text of those stories.
August 25, 2004: After determining that the UEP was not in compliance
with the latest National Advertising Review Board's ruling, the Better Business
Bureau officially referred the case to the Federal Trade Commission for potential
law enforcement action. Click here
to see the Associated Press story on the referral, here
to see the Des Moines Register story and here
to see the USA Today story.
February 15, 2005: COK and four egg consumers filed a lawsuit against
two retailers and an egg producer alleging that the "Animal Care Certified"
(ACC) logo stamped on egg cartons deceives shoppers by conveying a false message
of humane animal care. Read the details on this
lawsuit.
May 24, 2005: Representative Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), who is a ranking
member of the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection
which oversees the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), sent a letter on May 24,
2005, to FTC Chairman Deborah Majoras urging the Commission to take action on
a consumer protection matter involving the United Egg Producers' (UEP's) "Animal
Care Certified" (ACC) logo. Read Rep. Schakowsky's
letter.
September 2005: COK and Giant settle false advertising claims out of
court. Giant agrees to remove the "Animal Care Certified" logo from
its store brand egg cartons. Read the joint statement
issued by COK and Giant.
|